Swine Flu (PART 3??)

Posts: 430 Join date: 2009-06-11 Location: London

I'm so sorry guys, but... I just can't stop myself...

I came across a video about swine flu. I saw it a couple of days ago, and thought I'd just leave it alone. But I just found the info too juicy... I couldn't stop myself and now I'm posting the link here.

You should see each of the four parts on the right hand side

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAntiTerrorist#p/c/68DDE3E69792711C/0/njBL-5dtCW4

Disclaimer:

Yes, the creator of the video is wearing a mask. But if you feel that affects the credibility of the video please bear in mind that his channel is the 90th most subscribed channel on the whole of youtube (that's pretty big in the world of the interwebs Smile

) And here is a link to another video of his where he explains exactly what the mask is all about http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAntiTerrorist

I'm actually in no hurry to start up another debate like the last one (in which, as Richie pointed out, I received pwnage lol Smile

) but I'd be interested to hear some opinions...

Oh boy... what have I started? Shocked

Or re-started?

Posts: 296 Join date: 2009-09-08 Location: Cumbria, UK

Youtube is very slow for me but i'm getting through them. It is slightly disconcerting to see the get-out clauses - as we all know Pharmaceutical companies don't necessarily abide by the same laws and ethics as society.

For me this video raised some important points. I wasn't aware that the jab was to be made compulsary (Is it?), and I'm dismayed to see how little it's been tested.

What the video doesn't cover however, is the danger that H1H1 presents vs the risks of the vaccinne.

I think the stuff at the end with regards to RFID chips was a bit offbeat, but that's a topic for a different debate.

Posts: 430 Join date: 2009-06-11 Location: London

Quote:

For me this video raised some important points. I wasn't aware that the jab was to be made compulsary (Is it?)

It's not compulsory here. But I think in the states it 'kind of' is in certain states. But don't hold me to that. Either way, it's definitely been talked about (by the authorities) way too much. Lots of wishy-washy yes/no answers. It's obvious (in my opinion and many others') that it is certainly on the agenda and that they having been looking to make that happen from day one (by hyping it up way too much).

Quote:

What the video doesn't cover however, is the danger that H1H1 presents vs the risks of the vaccinne.

From what I've seen, the vaccine is more harmful than helpful. H1N1 is considered non-lethal despite all the hype. More people die of 'normal' flu (which isn't much different). Bloody hell, my aunt and uncle in the land of scouse have had it. One week off work, then back to normal. No worries.

But the list of adverse affects for the vaccine is getting bigger week by week.

Quote:

I think the stuff at the end with regards to RFID chips was a bit offbeat, but that's a topic for a different debate.

Yeah... I raised an eyebrow there too. But only slightly Smile

I guess that's why he left it to the end.

Subject: Re: Swine Flu (PART 3??) Sun Nov 15, 2009 2:00 am

The WHO has basically said that the vaccine should be made mandatory as apparently the swine flu is a pandemic... you should, fire and brimstone is falling from the sky and the seas are boiling... btw buy the new Lexus.

My feelings on this are very strong. If it was a case of wanting to vaccinate people against ebola or a DISEASE I'd be in line with everyone else. However, this is the goddam flu and the vaccine's testing and data are flimsy and suspect at best. Besides I've already had it, and am therefore already immune to it in the future.

If this is going to be legislated then I guess there will be an arrest warrant out for me as there's no way I'm voluntarily drinking the cool aid.

Subject: Re: Swine Flu (PART 3??) Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:28 pm

I was trying to stay out of this. I expect that compulsory vaccination is just being mooted to appear that something is being done. IF it really was that virulent then perhaps they will try bringing it in. Suspect that for a retro-virus it's going to be near impossible.

The WHO can be worryingly perverse for an organisation that should be using science to combat threatening disease. It seems to be at the mercy of American religio-politics at time. For instance, check out this idiocy. It's on a par with Jeanette Winterson, wanting funding for homeopathic treatment for HIV

http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/index.html

Posts: 296 Join date: 2009-09-08 Location: Cumbria, UK

That's a good point Blackops, much like a lot of schemes it can help your [delicately balanced] image to appear to have a plan, I suppose.